<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Digital Photography Weblog</title>
<link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com</link>
<description>The Digital Photography Weblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>The Next Nikon</title><link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/21/the-next-nikon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/21/the-next-nikon/</guid><comments>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/21/the-next-nikon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/nikon/" rel="tag">Nikon</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" height="233" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/07/nextnikon.png" width="436" align="middle" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<p>They are not giving much away - More Power, More Control, More Versatile and More Excitement. And thats it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/">Nikon</a> are to release a new camera in 19 days. Rumours suggest it will be a 10.2 megapixel replacement for the D70/D70s series. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><br /></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nikonusa.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/21/the-next-nikon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/forward/645554/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/21/the-next-nikon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>new nikon</category><category>new nikon cameras</category><category>NewNikon</category><category>NewNikonCameras</category><category>nikon cameras</category><category>NikonCameras</category><dc:creator>Andrew Barrow</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-07-21T13:02:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Aperture getting the axe?</title><link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/27/aperture-getting-the-axe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/27/aperture-getting-the-axe/</guid><comments>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/27/aperture-getting-the-axe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a></p><img width="215" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="282" border="0" align="right"src="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/aperture.jpg" alt="" />Or maybe just defibrillation? Applewatch site Think Secret <a href="http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0604aperture.html">is reporting</a> that Apple hasfired most of the Aperture devel team, and there's apparently been no word yet on how or when they're going to bereplaced. I have to side with the unnamed insiders cited in the TS article: this shouldn't really be a surprise.Aperture has been buggy and rough around the edges--even for an Apple 1.0 release--and the design and marketing modelhas been a complete disaster. You know you've gotten something really, really wrong when you end up reimbursing youcustomers nearly half the purchase price. Nevertheless, it's a bit of a shock from Apple, which normally follows adogged fake it 'till you make it approach to development, particularly software development, and it raises some seriousquestions about the project's future. In the sort run, at least, the outlook is good: it seems that Aperture is in thehands of the same people who turn out Final Cut, which is arguably Apple's best--and best-run--software project. Let'sjust hope they're as good with still images as they are with video.<br /><br />[via <ahref="http://www.stockphototalk.com/phototalk/2006/04/quicklinks_for__20.html">SPT</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0604aperture.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/27/aperture-getting-the-axe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/forward/612564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/27/aperture-getting-the-axe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Apple, Aperture</category><category>Apple,Aperture</category><dc:creator>Jay Savage</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-27T13:57:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>