<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Digital Photography Weblog</title>
<link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com</link>
<description>The Digital Photography Weblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>PCMag names Pentax *ist DS2 one the worst products in Q1 2006</title><link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/28/pcmag-names-pentax-ist-ds2-one-the-worst-products-in-q1-2006/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/28/pcmag-names-pentax-ist-ds2-one-the-worst-products-in-q1-2006/</guid><comments>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/28/pcmag-names-pentax-ist-ds2-one-the-worst-products-in-q1-2006/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/pentax/" rel="tag">Pentax</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a></p><img width="200" vspace="0" hspace="0" height="206" border="0" align="right"src="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/DS2.jpg" alt="" />This seems a little harsh to me, giventhey gave it a "<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1930734,00.asp">fair</a>" review. I'd thinkthat to be eligible for for a "wost of" you'd need a 1-star or less rating, but their point is good. Pentax'sDSLRs have so far been disappointing, and the 6.1MP *ist DS2 isn't even in the same league as it's supposed competitionlike the Nikon D50 and D70s, with a noisy sensor and digicamish recycle time. This is sad for a company with Pentax'shistory; hopefulyy the joint venture with Samsung will quickly bring them into the digital age with style, even if theDS2--their first joint product--isn't quite up to snuff.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1953651,00.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/28/pcmag-names-pentax-ist-ds2-one-the-worst-products-in-q1-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/forward/612965/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/28/pcmag-names-pentax-ist-ds2-one-the-worst-products-in-q1-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>*ist DS2</category><category>*istDs2</category><dc:creator>Jay Savage</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-28T14:17:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>D200 Review at Shutterbug</title><link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/26/d200-review-at-shutterbug/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/26/d200-review-at-shutterbug/</guid><comments>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/26/d200-review-at-shutterbug/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/nikon/" rel="tag">Nikon</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a></p><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="188" border="0" align="right" alt=""src="http://www.weblogsinc.com/common/images/3060000000052008.JPG?0.9650692390149186" />George Schaub has a Nice reviewof the Nikon D200 up over at <ahref="http://www.shutterbug.net/equipmentreviews/proquality_digital_slrs/0506nikon/">Shutterbug</a>, the kind of reviewthat makes me wonder why I don't remember to read them more often. (Actually, that's easy, no RSS feed. Which is ashame, really). What I like about George's reviews is that he's a photographer first, a writer second, and a technicianonly at need. He doesn't test a camera against three kinds of ideal lighting, or shoot endless pictures of USAF charts.He takes a camera out, shoots with it, and tells you how it went. Don't get me wrong: I'm a geek at heart and I getcaught up in the minutae, too. I love it. But I also&nbsp; like the way Shutterbug brings a writerly approach to theoverwhelmingly techie world of web reviews. But I digress. The long and short of of it, where the D200 is concerned, isthis:<br /><br /><strong>Pros</strong><br />   o. Superb lens, with manual focus ring and mechanical zoom feature<br/>   o. Ultrahigh 10-megapixel resolution, gorgeous colors, snappy contrast,    superlative image quality at ISO160-400 with or without flash<br />   o. Better than average digital noise control at ISO 800 and 1600 for a   prosumer digicam<br />   o. Includes the most important features for serious photography<br />   <br />  <strong>Cons</strong><br />   o. Some exposure and White Balance problems in low light, but can be solved    withoverrides <br />   o. Long shutter speed NR system is too aggressive; avoid using this feature    when possible <br/>   o. In camera sharpening algorithm does not produce ideal results in large    prints<br />   o. Can shootonly three JPEGs in a sequence; in raw capture, no Continuous    advance and slow data recording due to (uncompressed)20MB file size <br /><br />Don't let that list of cons scare you, though: the WB issues are minor, and you'll probablybe using a custom WB most of the time. Ditto on the NR and sharpening; he actually raves about the NR in mostcircumstances, and when it comes to sharpening, you'll probably be using RAW for large prints anyway.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.shutterbug.net/equipmentreviews/proquality_digital_slrs/0506nikon/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/26/d200-review-at-shutterbug/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/forward/612114/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/26/d200-review-at-shutterbug/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>D200</category><category>Shutterbug</category><dc:creator>Jay Savage</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-26T12:48:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Weekend review roundup: HP R927</title><link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-hp-r927/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-hp-r927/</guid><comments>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-hp-r927/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a></p><img width="111" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="75" border="0" align="right" alt=""src="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/HP-Photosmart-R927-sm-thumb.jpg" />The HP R927 seems tohave been the talk of the town this week, with reviews from Digital Camera Review Page, Digital Camera Tracker, andEngadget:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/hp/photosmart_r927-review/index.shtml">DCRP</a>:<em>Photo quality turned out to be the R927's weak point. While the camera took well exposed photos with vibrantcolors, I was disappointed with the amount of noise and purple fringing on my photos. While these issues won't make adifference if you're making 4 x 6 inch prints, you will notice them in 8 x 10 prints or when viewing themonscreen.</em><br /><ahref="http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/archives/2006/04/18/hp-photosmart-r927-review.html"><br />DCT</a>:<em>Companies can fill a camera with impressive features however, the bottom line is image quality and performance.While the R927 is fun to use it's not without a few quirks. One of the most irritating to me was purple fringes thatappear in photographs. While this won't present a problem on smaller prints perhaps up to 5 x 7 it will be a problem onlarger prints.<br /></em><ahref="http://digitalcameras.engadget.com/2006/04/18/hps-8-megapixel-photosmart-r927-reviewed/"><br />Engadget</a>:<em>It's still seems a bit silly to be shooting 8 megapixel shots out of such a compact camera, but we're not going tostand in your way, and neither will HP with their flagship compact offering, the Photosmart R927.</em><br /><br />I'mnot going to buck the trend here. Squeezing 8.2 MP onto a 1/1.8 chip makes about as much sense as as <ahref="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_burner">ricing</a> your Civic. Especially when you can get the <ahref="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-dmc-fz7/">DMC-FZ7</a> for less.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-hp-r927/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/forward/610958/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-hp-r927/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>HP Photosmart R927</category><category>HpPhotosmartR927</category><dc:creator>Jay Savage</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-22T18:50:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Weekend review roundup: DMC-FZ7</title><link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-dmc-fz7/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-dmc-fz7/</guid><comments>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-dmc-fz7/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/panasonic/" rel="tag">Panasonic</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="143" border="0" align="right"src="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/DMC-FZ7.jpg" alt="" />We reported <ahref="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/20/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz7-gets-pcmag-editors-choice/">earlierin the week</a> that PCMag gave the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7 and editor's choice ward. Other people have been giving ithigh marks, too. Here's the rundown:<br /><br /><ahref="http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/camera/review/86/page_1.html">LetsGoDigital</a>: <em>a powerful combination;guarantees high quality images and suits a large group of users. Despite its user-friendliness and low entry-level, thecamera will certainly not limit or confine those who wish to expand their basic knowledge of photography, and are keento experiment a little more</em>. <br /><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/FZ7/FZ7A.HTM"><br />ImagingResource</a>: <em>Like other recent members of the line, the FZ7 combines good image quality, responsive handling, andvery effective optical image stabilization in a very attractively-priced digital camera. Its range of exposure controland image adjustments will be appealing to experienced users, while its ease of use in Program and its various Scenemodes make it approachable for even rank beginners</em>.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-dmc-fz7/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/forward/610948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/22/weekend-review-roundup-dmc-fz7/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Lumix DMC-FZ7</category><category>LumixDmc-fz7</category><dc:creator>Jay Savage</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-22T17:31:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7 gets PCMag Editor's Choice</title><link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/20/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz7-gets-pcmag-editors-choice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/20/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz7-gets-pcmag-editors-choice/</guid><comments>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/20/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz7-gets-pcmag-editors-choice/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/panasonic/" rel="tag">Panasonic</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="143" border="0" align="right" alt=""src="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/DMC-FZ7.jpg" />In <ahref="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1951354,00.asp">their review</a> yesterday, PC Magazine gave the <ahref="http://15001&amp;catalogId=13401&amp;itemId=96063&amp;catGroupId=24999&amp;modelNo=DMC-FZ7S&amp;surfModel=DMC-FZ7S&amp;cacheProgram=11002&amp;cachePartner=7000000000000005702">PanasonicLumix DMC-FZ7</a> a solid four stars and named it their Editor's Choice for budget superzooms, making it the third LumixFZ to hold that title. I tend to agree with their assessment, especially given the sub-$400 price, but it's important toremember that the category is <em>budget</em> superzooms. With noticeably--although apparently not crippling--shutterlag; slight purple fringing around highlights and a somewhat finicky LCD, this is a solidly consumer camera, formfactor and 12x f/2.8 zoom notwithstanding. With that in mind, the 3.3 sec. start-up time is acceptable and the 1.6 sec.recycle time and 1500 line resolution are well above average for a moderately priced 6MP camera. Color and clarity areboth good, barrel distortion at 6mm is very slight, controls are well designed (curing a personal peeve I've had withPanasonic in the past), the built-in flash seems well-designed, and image stabilization is excellent.<br /><br />Soundslike a winner to me.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1951354,00.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/20/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz7-gets-pcmag-editors-choice/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/forward/610247/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/20/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz7-gets-pcmag-editors-choice/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Lumix DMC-FZ7</category><category>Panasonic</category><category>PCMag</category><dc:creator>Jay Savage</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-20T10:19:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>2006 TIPA Awards</title><link>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/19/2006-tipa-awards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/19/2006-tipa-awards/</guid><comments>http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/19/2006-tipa-awards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/canon/" rel="tag">Canon</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/nikon/" rel="tag">Nikon</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/lenses/" rel="tag">Lenses</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/sigma/" rel="tag">Sigma</a>, <a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/category/nikkor/" rel="tag">Nikkor</a></p><img width="159" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="110" border="0" align="right"src="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/TIPA.gif" alt="" />The 2006 Technical Image PressAssociation (<a href="http://www.tipa.com">TIPA</a>) 2006 European <a href="http://www.tipa.com/awa_2006.lasso">Photoand Imaging Awards</a> have been announced. There are 36 categories, but some of the highlights:<br /><br/><strong>D-SLR Entry Level</strong>: Nikon D50<br /><strong>D-SLR Expert</strong>: Nikon D200<br /><strong>D-SLRProfessional</strong>: Canon EOS 5D<br /><strong>D-SLR D-System</strong>: Hasselblad H2D-39<br /><strong>High-EndProfessional System</strong>: Sinar M System<br /><strong>Digital Back</strong>: Leaf Aptus 75<br /><strong>ConsumerLens</strong>:                  Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC<br /><strong>Professional Lens</strong>:                  AF-S VR Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED<br /><br />Looks like solid choices all around, although I was a littlesurprised by the glowing review of the Nikkor lens; I'm a little suspicious of the built-in vibration reduction. Butthen I'm suspicious of most new technologies until they prove themselves. Looks like VR may be ready for prime time.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tipa.com/awa_2006.lasso>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/19/2006-tipa-awards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/forward/609924/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/19/2006-tipa-awards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>TIPA</category><category>TIPA 2006</category><dc:creator>Jay Savage</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-19T11:40:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>